WEEKLY COLUMN
BY UNITY LABOUR PARTY
July 30th, 2010
THE UNITY LABOUR PARTY IS BETTER BY FAR
There can be no doubt in the minds of many Vincentians that the NDP
convention on July 18th 2010, was a failure, a disappointment, and
an indication that the NDP is not fit for, nor ready for government in St.Vincent and the Grenadines. Their supporters were
unhappy with the pronouncements of their leaders, particularly Arnhim Eustace and James Mitchell. For sure, their
convention has demonstrated that the Unity Labour
Party is better by far, and is the party of choice of Vincentians, to take the
country forward.
As far as Vincentians are concerned the NDP has no plans for the
advancement of the citizens of this country, accept to put forward some
nebulous plans for the return of the cocoa industry, and the provision of
computers for school children in the “ median term”.
There was nothing on the economy, and the vital sectors like education, health,
the social services, security and crime, agriculture, diplomatic relations, and
the list goes on. Here is party on the verge of a general election, and it
cannot provide the country with it’s
strategy, it’s vision, and it’s plans to govern the country.
But there is a very good reason for this. The NDP wants to unleash
a reign of economic terror on Vincentians, the likes of which we have never
seen before. Eustace and the NDP will reduce the civil service, the police
force and the hardworking nurses. He and his sidekicks have already said that
the civil service is too large, so there will be layoffs, salaries will be
frozen and unemployment will rise dramatically.
Eustace has already warned Vincentians that his party will adopt
some harsh economic measures. What does this mean? It means that Eustace and
the NDP have no clue as to how to govern the country, that they are coming back
to finish the job of ruining our beloved state. They want to get their hands on
the National Treasury, on the National Commercial Bank to provide more sweet
heart deals. They want to get their hands on state lands to sell to their
cronies cheap cheap cheap
(Eustace and Mitchell are familiar with this).
Make no mistake Vincentians, the NDP will dismantle all the good
work that the ULP, led by Dr. Ralph Gonsalves, has
done. The Education Revolution will be dismantled and the country will return
to the days when only 39 percent of the children who write the Common Entrance,
will go to secondary school. They will reduce the number of nurses who are
being trained. They will reduce the number of scholarships being offered to Vincentians,
and in some cases, some of you will lose your scholarships.
The Housing Revolution will be a thing of the past and the
country’s poverty level will begin to rise. The Ottley
Hall inquiry will go away, and Vincentians will never learn the facts abut the most corrupt project in the history of St.Vincent and the Grenadines.
Most important, Vincentins will see their
dream of an international airport disappear. Eustace and the NDP have already
described the project as a “phantom” even while construction is proceeding
at top speed before our very eyes. Only the ULP can build the international
airport at Argyle.
By contrast the ULP has already articulated some important policies,
projects and strategies for the third term. These include
We
have only listed sixteen of these projects and the list is long. So far, the
ULP administration has completed over 180 national projects since it assumed
power in 2001. Another 50 are in the pipeline. What a record by the ULP led by
Comrade Ralph.
It is
this record that is a thorn in the side of Eustace and the NDP. They cannot criticize
the ULP on it’s performance,
in which there was a massive turnaround in the development of St. Vincent and
the Grenadines. Every sector was affected in a positive way and ALL Vincentians
have benefited in a tangible way, from the development efforts of the ULP.
Against
this record the NDP has resorted to some personal attacks against Comrade Ralph
and other officials of the ULP administration. They have descended into the
lowest gutter politics ever because they have no answer to the ULP. They talk
about corruption, but they forget that it is the NDP that has defined
“corruption” in the history of St.Vincent and the
Grenadines. We cannot forget the history of the NDP in their 17 year period of
governance, during which they made a shambles of this country. We must not
forget their record, and all Vincentians, particularly those members,
supporters and admirers of the ULP must be proud of the record of this great
party. We must stand firm for a third term. We Nah turn Back!
July 23rd
2010
NONSENSE
AND DISHONESTY FROM NDP
EMPTY NDP CONVENTION
The much-hyped Convention of the
opposition NDP last weekend was devoid of substance, empty to the core. Every reasonable person would so acknowledge. Of course, the NDP die-hards are busy trying
to convince themselves that they had a “great” Convention but they do so
without any conviction whatsoever.
Further, the gathering numbers were way below the NDP’s reasonable
expectation; and the composition of the small crowd was more dispiriting – some
old Joshuaites and Junta folks, assorted opportunists, plus Kenneth John’s
handful of old Ralph-haters from the DFM known in political history as “Damned
Foolish Men!” Only a tiny smattering of
young persons were to be seen.
The feature speaker, James
Mitchell, did not once endorse Arnhim Eustace or his team. Instead, Mitchell as usual blew his own
trumpet, insulted people, and made utterances to suggest that senility has
probably set in. Eustace’s speech was
boring, uninspiring, and, in many parts, plain dishonest. His speech lacked focus. He did not articulate a vision, philosophy,
policy or programme. There was no
compelling narrative from him that he and his party possessed something different
and better for the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Frankly, Eustace was at his worst. He offered no hope while proclaiming an empty
slogan “Project Hope” – Hope meaning “Help Our Party Endure”. Not, help our country improve; help his party
to endure; that is his base concur. And
he calls himself a leader! God help us!
MITCHELL RAMBLES
James Mitchell helped the ULP
very well in his speech. Let’s identify
some of the highlights. He said the
following:-
ü That in 1984
when he came to power, teachers, civil servants and policemen were going to
work stink because there was no water for them to bathe.
ü In this
Mitchell was both insulting and dishonest.
ü That he
jailed Arthur Williams and that nobody could jail him.
Mitchell
gives us an insight into his political interference in the Police and
Judiciary. A Prime Minister has no power
to jail anyone; he cannot also advise any official or judge to jail him for
Ottley Hall. All we ask is that he stops
his legal maneuvers which he is using to avoid testifying before the Commission
of Enquiry.
ü That the
future of St. Vincent and the Grenadines and agriculture lies in cocoa
cultivation.
In 17
years in office, Mitchell’s NDP never advocated cocoa production. All of a sudden it is our saviour. To be sure, cocoa has a niche role in
agriculture and agro-processing and the ULP has been pursuing this. But SVG’s saviour it is not. Perhaps, Mitchell has a little too much cocoa
in the sun, so to speak.
ü That he
would study the international airport further.
Mitchell has lost his marbles on this.
The international airport is an on-going reality. It is happening before our very eyes. Mitchell and the NDP want to stop it. Eustace calls it a “phantom project”. But the ULP will finish it by July 2012.
ü That
Burton Williams must apologise for running against NDP in 1994; Burton’s
apology to him and the party internally is not enough. He must do so publicly at the
Convention. Opportunist as ever Burton
did as his master divined; he said his three “James Mitchells” to atone for his
sin of betrayal. Burton would learn in
the elections the consequence of all this.
EUSTACE’S EMPTINESS AND DISHONESTY
Eustace’s focus was his beating
up on Desmond Morgan for owing the NCB just over $2 million for which the NCB
has a court judgment. Eustace did not
say that the NCB was holding nearly $4 million worth of property (3 pieces of
land and a house) by way of legal mortgage for the debt. Eustace’s omission here was deliberately
dishonest; he wanted to create the impression that the loan was unsecured. He did not say, too, that the interest rate
was commercial; there was nothing preferential about the loan for the Blue Sky
Centre business.
Ralph’s removal of Morgan as
Chairman of the NCB Board in November 2008 after learning that Morgan was in
arrears in his loan was “good governance” at the centre of government. The NCB’s action is “good corporate
governance”. Contrast all this with the
sweet-heart mortgages for ministers of government during the NDP days and the
refusal of the NCB then to put any NDP high-up in Court for default. Why Arnhim does not explain how he and
Mitchell got land in “secret” at preferential prices.
Eustace’s attack on the
Education Revolution was pitiful. The simple
fact is that the ULP has transformed Education in SVG for the better. Every aspect of education has prospered. He is very late in the day talking about
laptops for students. The ULP is way ahead on this as Ralph pointed out in his
press conference last Tuesday.
Eustace’s ploy about a 5 percent
salary cut in the future for his ministers if he gets into office is pure
bramble. In October 2001, after 9/11,
the ULP ministers took a 5 percent salary cut; the PM called on Eustace to do
the same but he and his opposition members refused. We say to him: Take the salary cut now and Ralph would take
one twice as big!
PROJECT HOPE
Eustace wants “Help Our Party
Endure” (Hope). This is infantile and with no substance. In any event of virtues, Hope, Faith and
Love, the greatest is Love. And Frank Da
Silva has said what everybody knows that Eustace has no love in his heart. Frank rightly stated that Ralph is the one
who has love. And love is the answer.
July 16th
2010
DON’T BURN OUR BRIDGES: SAVING LIAT
A BOOK ON LIAT
On Wednesday July 14, 2010, a book of
historical and contemporary significance on LIAT was launched in Barbados. It is entitled Don’t Burn Our Bridges: The
Case for Owning Airlines and published recently by the University of the
West Indies Press. It is authored by Dr.
Jean Holder, the former distinguished head of the Caribbean Tourism
Organisation and currently the innovative Chairman of the Board of Directors of
LIAT. By training and experience Dr.
Holder has no equal in the Caribbean or elsewhere to write such a book, a point
made in the volume’s Foreword by Professor Hilary Beckles, the Principal of the
Cave Hill Campus of the UWI.
The book, too, is about more than LIAT since it
also examines broadly the state of the airline industry in the Caribbean and
its umbilical connection to tourism. But
it is largely about LIAT. The volume
reeks with a robust, thoughtful nationalism and its title reflects, summarily,
that perspective in the interest of our Caribbean civilisation. It is a “must read” to anyone interested in
public policy in our region.
Over thirteen chapters and nine appendices, Dr.
Holder enriches immeasurably our understanding of LIAT and the regional air
transportation industry. The chapters
traverse the following subject areas: The case for Caribbean carriers; the
history of the main regional air carriers; comparative financial performance of
Caribbean and international airlines; the options for cooperation between
regional airlines; the LIAT case study; the LIAT-Caribbean Star merger and the
negotiations with Star’s owner, Sir Allen Stanford; the issue of the
circumstances when an airline monopoly is justifiable; deregulation, fare
setting, and oil prices; the year 2008, the worst in civil aviation history;
the 2008 economic crisis and the region’s response; Caribbean tourism and air
transport; and air transportation in the CSME’s future.
The nine appendices cover a range of statistics
relevant to LIAT, air transport, tourism, airplanes, and LIAT itself. They constitute a rich harvest of relevant
information for policy makers and the general public.
ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES
AND SAVING LIAT
Dr. Holder rightly highlights the roles of the
ULP administration in ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES and Prime Minister Ralph
Gonsalves in the saving and restructuring of LIAT. Let Dr. Holder’s words speak:
“In reality, LIAT became largely dependent on the Antigua and Barbuda
government until a government led by the Hon. Dr. Ralph Gonsalves was elected
in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Prime
Minister Gonsalves became a strong supporter of LIAT and won the support of
Barbados for the cause. Speedwing’s call
for EC $26 million from governments only yielded EC $2.6 million from St.
Vincent and the Grenadines. Prime
Minister Gonsalves was also responsible for bringing other private sector
resources on board. He later took the
lead in the hiring of Zwaig Financial Consultants of Canada, whose sound
advise, delivered largely through
Cameron Mc Caw, was to prove a major turning point for LIAT. By 2004, the Government of St. Vincent and
the Grenadines had become LIAT’s largest shareholder with 25.26 percent of the
shares, ahead of Barbados with 22.19 percent, and Antigua and Barbuda with
18.38 percent”.
In fact Dr. Holder does not record everything
here about ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES’s initial material contribution: The
figure is not $2.6 million but $2.9 million in equity plus $2 million in LIAT’s
bonds purchase by the state-owned VINLEC, and some $6 million, which LIAT owed
ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES in landing fees and taxes was converted into
preference shares in the company for ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES. Nevertheless, we thank him for highlighting
the role of the ULP government and the Comrade in saving LIAT in those dark,
rough days.
Dr. Holder goes on further to state:
“The period from 2000 to 2004, which included the horrors of 9/11, was
one of the most difficult on record for regional and international air transport. Cost inputs into air transportation,
especially those relating to safety, security and insurance, began to escalate
exponentially. The launch of Caribbean
Star in 2000 had been followed by that of Caribbean Sun in 2003, operating out
of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and also competing with LIAT on some of its
routes. It was later discovered that
both Caribbean Star and Caribbean Sun were suffering huge losses; but thanks to
Sir Allen Stanford’s deep pockets, seemed totally unaffected by their losses”.
In the light of some recent negative sounds
emanating from Trinidad and Tobago about the use of the CARICOM Petroleum
Stabilisation Fund (also known as the CARICOM Petroleum Facility), it is useful
to record its assistance to a vital regional entity. Dr. Holder addresses this matter, thus:
“In 2004, LIAT’s Shareholder governments (Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados
and St. Vincent and the Grenadines) provided LIAT with EC $21 million; and in
the first quarter of 2005, they persuaded the Government of Trinidad and
Tobago, with the approval of the CARICOM governments, to provide LIAT with a
grant of EC $44 million from the CARICOM Petroleum Stabilisation Fund. This was a major achievement by Prime
Ministers Arthur, Spencer and Gonsalves, since initially, Prime Minister
Manning was adamant that his government would provide no further support to
LIAT. What brought about the change of
heart in a session behind closed doors would probably be interesting to
listen”.
Actually, Ralph Gonsalves was the person who was
primarily responsible for persuading Manning.
Arthur and Manning had clashed verbally in the wider meeting with
government officials and LIAT’s Board.
Ralph called for “time out” and a private session. He placed LIAT within a regional context,
raised the possibility of a nexus between LIAT and BWIA, and traced the
historic role of the Caribbean’s titans including Dr. Eric Williams in keeping
LIAT in the air. Ralph’s personal
friendship with Patrick Manning since university days helped. Later, Owen Arthur was to applaud Ralph for a
splendid performance. Our Prime
Minister, as Chairman of LIAT’s shareholders, was entrusted with the task of
persuading all the CARICOM Heads of Government about using EC $44 million for
LIAT. It was quite a task. It took PM Gonsalves ten days to do so. This experience told him a lot, positive and
negative, about CARICOM.
PURCHASE OF CARIBBEAN STAR
In 2007, the losses incurred by Caribbean Star,
in excess of US $35 annually, compelled Stanford to “sue for peace” with LIAT. He realised that he was unable to win in a
battle with three strong-willed Prime Ministers and the people of the
region. All of Stanford money could not
purchase our nationalist leaders. To buy
the assets of Caribbean Star (which did not cost a great deal) and to assist in
LIAT’s further restructuring, LIAT’s three shareholder governments borrowed US
$60 million from the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB). Barbados was responsible to repay US $35
million; Antigua and Barbuda, US $20 million; St. Vincent and the Grenadines,
US $5 million. St. Vincent and the
Grenadines insisted on the application of the principle: Equity among equals,
proportionality among unequals. St. Vincent
and the Grenadines had taken LIAT out of trouble, seen off a dangerous competitor
in Stanford, and was now prepared to assure a lesser though still significant
financial burden. In the process
Barbados became the largest shareholder; Antigua-Barbuda, the next; and St.
Vincent and the Grenadines, the smallest shareholder government. Ralph Gonsalves remained the Chairman of the
Shareholders, given his historic role in the saving of LIAT.
All of this and more is in this informative
book by Dr. Holder.
LIAT AS A MONOPOLY
Dr. Holder defends the near-monopoly status of
LIAT as a good thing for the region.
Some monopolies are good; others are bad. Holder’s case for LIAT is overwhelmingly
strong and convincing.
It is more than time for the other Caribbean
governments to provide LIAT with market support or to put equity capital in
it. LIAT is too vital to be left to
three governments. More money is needed
right away for fleet renewal!
July 9th 2010
PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE ULP
[Excerpts
from the Prime Minister’s 2010 Budget Address delivered on May 25, 2010 at the
House of Assembly]
SUPPORT
FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR
Mr. Speaker, in every Budget
speech that I have delivered and in every set of Estimates I have presented to
this Honourable House, I have highlighted my government’s unequivocal support
for the private sector and its quest to build a strategic partnership between
the private and cooperative sectors and the State. Every objective observer recognizes all this.
There is, however, an antiquated,
anachronistic ideological divide of no relevance to our national condition in
which some persons are still imprisoned, and who hold that a government that
defends and uplifts the poor and the working people is automatically against
the private sector and wealth creation.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Indeed, economic successes
recorded by the private sector and the macro-economy as a whole during the past
nine years stem, in part, from the strengthening of the strategic partnership
between the private and cooperative sectors and the State. To be sure, the State has been a force for
good in our Caribbean and cannot retreat from a role as a producer of public
goods and services and as a robust facilitator and staunch supporter of private
enterprise in tourism, agriculture, fisheries, manufacturing, banking,
insurance, wholesale and retail trade, transportation, telecommunications, and
an assorted range of other services.
Mr. Speaker, simply put, the private
sector is central to wealth and job creation.
It commands a pivotal role in the on-going quest to build a modern,
competitive, many-sided, post-colonial economy which is at once local,
national, regional, and global.
GOOD
INVESTMENT CLIMATE
My government is determined to
maintain and further enhance a Good Investment Climate. The central elements in this regard revolve
around: The maintenance of the
macro-economic fundamentals of a stable currency, relatively low inflation,
fiscal soundness, enhanced competitiveness, and increased productivity; an
effective and efficient state administrative apparatus; political stability,
safety and security; sensible and practical, but not overbearing Regulations; a
fair, balanced and facilitating regime of taxation; a well-functioning,
accommodating financial and banking system; a sound and competitively-priced
infrastructure of communications (air, sea and land), telecommunications,
water, electricity, education, health, and other social services; a democratic system of good governance,
including a sound judicial system; and a trained, and trainable, workforce and
a flexible labour market. My government
has been focused on securing these essentials, and more, for the private sector
and the nation as a whole. But as
always, much more, can and should be done.
In respect of specific sectors or types of business, there have been,
too, targeted strategic interventions to facilitate private sector development.
OUR
RECORD
Across the board there has been a
reduction of the standard rate of company tax and personal income tax from 40
percent in 2001 to 32.5 percent at present.
My government intends to reduce this further as soon as the economic
circumstances permit. Exporters to
CARICOM and extra-regional markets have taxation rates as low as 15
percent. Tax incentives or reliefs of
all kinds abound for producers in agriculture, fisheries, tourism,
manufacturing, construction companies of residential houses, small enterprises,
among others.
The government has created four
vital institutions to facilitate business generally and in specific sectors,
namely, the Centre for Enterprise Development (CED), Invest SVG (formerly
National Investment Promotions Incorporated), the Tourism Authority, and the
Banana Services Unit at the Ministry of Agriculture. They do most valuable work.
Mr. Speaker, my government has
been investing considerable time and resources to ensure that the Customs
Department and the St. Vincent and the Grenadines Port Authority deliver
quality services at competitive prices.
I know that clients at these entities have a myriad of complaints, some
justified but some not. There have been
marked improvements at both Customs and the Port but there is no room for
complacency. As Minister responsible for
the Customs and the Port, I hear the complaints and I give the assurance that
both entities will continue to lift their game.
In the 2010 Estimates there are significant allocations of financial
resources for the further development of both Customs and the Port.
PRIVATE
SECTOR INITIATIVES
In 2010, important private sector
initiatives are on the cards, some on-going, some about to start up. On-going tourism investments at Buccama,
Bequia, Union Island and Canouan will add significantly to the tourism
capacity. I have been advised that the
first phase of 350 rooms of the 1,000-room Buccama resort is scheduled to be
opened in July 2010.
By July 2010, too, further
planned investments of at least US $100 million are to commence in the
developed resort area of Canouan. The
construction of even more high-end facilities will further transform Canouan as
an elite destination of choice. There
will be a huge demand for construction and other workers on this site. The investors will make the full announcements
at the appropriate time. The proposed
investments in the south of the island are now put in sequence, following the
imminent investments in the north. Mr. Speaker, this additional massive
investment in Canouan would not even have been considered had my government not
built the Canouan Jet Airport.
Tourism investments are also
planned for Bequia, Union Island, Mayreau, and mainland St. Vincent. The issue of their start-up is hinged on the
extent of the rebound in the real economy, globally.
Several important domestic
private sector investments are underway or are planned, reflecting a continued
confidence in our country and its governance.
The most visible is the multi-million dollar investment in the form of the
construction of a huge supermarket at Arnos Vale by the owners of Aunt Jobe
Supermarket. Other domestic investments
include small hotels, apartment buildings, agro-processing, and the expansion
of existing business enterprises such as Bottlers Limited and Caribbean Glass
and Aluminum Company. This latter
company has now commendably gone regional in its production and distribution.
FURTHER
PLANS
Mr. Speaker, I have received a
matrix, prepared by the Ministry of Telecommunications and Industry, with a list
of 20 companies, sound performers, which produce high quality goods and
services but which require technical and financial support of one kind or
another. I have mandated the Minister of
Telecommunications and Industry to engage actively each of these companies to
ensure that the Government facilitate them in their endeavours. More generally, I am seeking to mobilise
competitively-priced capital for on-lending to these and other enterprises. My government is determined that our domestic
private sector entities receive every support reasonably practicable, for their
further development.
July 2nd 2010
WELCOME
HOME TO OUR NATIONALS
HAPPY TO SEE YOU
The Unity Labour Party (ULP) welcomes our nationals
from overseas who have returned home temporarily for the Carnival season. Many of them are facing difficulties given
the economic challenges arising from the world financial crisis since September
2008 and continuing. Some have had to
make especial sacrifices to be home with us this year. We thus appreciate their presence more than
ever. They certainly add to the gaiety
and joy of our Carnival.
By far, most of our returning nationals would
be pleasantly reassured that despite the ongoing economic challenges
internationally and their impact locally, St. Vincent and the Grenadines is
holding its own and making continued progress.
Our returning nationals are likely to observe that practically every
Vincentian over the age of sixteen years has a cell phone; indeed, a large
number of our people have more than one cell phone since there are some 120
thousand active cell phones in a country with a population of 110 thousand
persons. Our returning nationals would
see more vehicles on the road than ever before: there were over seven thousand
vehicles in January 2001; today there are in excess of twenty five thousand
vehicles on our roads. They would see,
too, more houses, and beautiful houses, including state-built low-income
houses, than ever before. They would see
our people as well-dressed as people in New York, Toronto, and London. They would meet our Vincentians at home more
self-confident, educated and sophisticated than ever before. They would meet far fewer persons in a
condition of indigence than before; they would see the elderly better cared
more than ever. They would see, too,
many more churches than ever but sadly they are likely to notice that there is
more crime than in their youthful days, although the crime rate has recently
been falling and SVG is still the safest place in the Caribbean. And they would know that SVG is in a
dangerous neighborhood.
AS THEY LOOK AROUND
As our returning nationals look around, they would
see a thriving private sector throughout SVG especially between Buccament and
Argyle. Regional and international fast
food outlets are proliferating: Kentucky Fried Chicken, Bickles, Churches,
Mario’s, and Subway. Computers are all
around us. Water and electricity
services are well-supplied. Almost every
home has TV sets, VCRs, fridges, stoves, deep freezers, micro-wave units, and
water closets (flush toilets).
If our returning nationals go to Buccament,
they would see a massive hotel resort being built, the first ever on St.
Vincent itself and the largest in SVG.
By the end of 2010, it is expected that 350 cabanas/villas and rooms
would be ready; by mid-2012, over one thousand rooms would be available. This and other tourism investments are linked
to be construction of the Argyle International Airport which is on-going and
which is expected to be finished in 2012, so long as the ULP is returned to
government. Look around and you would
see, dear returning national, the range, number and quality of public sector
infrastructure projects as never before.
IN KINGSTOWN ALONE
Under the ULP government (March 2001 to the
present time) the returning national would take not of the following capital
projects in Kingstown, namely:
ü The Modern National Library;
ü The Archive and Documentation
Centre;
ü The refurbished and renovated
Peace Memorial building;
ü The transformation of the former
Richmond Hill Primary School into the Thomas Saunders Secondary School which
recently graduated its first batch of CXC graduates, ninety-five in all;
ü The rebuilding completely of the
Intermediate High School at Mc Kies Hill;
ü The building of a modern API/NBC
headquarters;
ü The building of the Reigate
Financial Complex;
ü The building of the modern NIS
Headquarters;
ü The on-going construction of a
modern Customs Headquarters;
ü The construction of a new bridge
at Bay Street (North River) and some shops for vendors;
ü The building of the Leeward Bus
Terminal;
ü The new National Lotteries
Headquarters;
ü The George Mc Intosh Community
Market and the cleaning up of the shacks in front of Bishops’ College;
ü The NEMO Headquarters;
ü The bridge next to NEMO
Headquarters;
ü The modern Technical Centre in
the Bishop’s College Yard;
ü The rebuilding and rehabilitation
of the old Post Office and Ministerial Office Complex;
ü The Forensic Laboratory;
ü The JP Eustace Memorial Secondary
School at Edinboro;
ü The complete rehabilitation of
Victoria Park and the provision of floodlights for football games at night; and
ü The rehabilitation of the Richmond
Hill Playing Field.
AROUND THE NATION
If the returning national takes time off to
tour the country as a whole he/she would see the following among other things:
ü The Argyle International Airport
under construction;
ü The Jet Airport at Canouan;
ü The rebuilding of the Arnos Vale
Sports Complex into a modern, multi-million dollar facility;
ü The upgrade and building of
playing fields all over SVG;
ü The construction of twelve
Learning Resource Centres and the on-going construction of three more;
ü The building of modern,
well-equipped Police Stations at Questelles, Biabou, Canouan, and Georgetown.
ü The rebuilding or renovation of
Police Stations at Rose Hall, Barrouallie, Layou, Retreat, Marriaqua, Stubbs,
Calliaqua, Sandy Bay, and Owia;
ü The repair of all other Police
Stations;
ü The building of the historic
Rabacca Bridget;
ü The construction of the access
roads on the Windward and Leeward sides for the Cross Country Road Project.
ü The construction of the Windward
Highway from Richmond Hill to Fancy.
ü The construction of the Argyle
By-Pass Road;
ü The construction of modern
secondary schools at Peter’s Hope, Edinboro, Mc Kies Hill, Union Island, and
on-going construction of a modern secondary school at West St. George;
ü The establishment of secondary
schools at Buccament, Colonarie, Sandy Bay, Richmond Hill;
ü The expansion of every other
secondary school in SVG;
ü The building of modern primary
schools at Byera, Sandy Bay, Bequia, Greggs, and Retreat;
ü The building of a modern
Polyclinic at Stubbs;
ü The renovation of twenty-one
other clinics in SVG, including the state-run pharmacies;
ü The building of the Layou Sea
Defence and Boardwalk; and
ü The building/renovation of
fifteen tourism sites.
ü
PROJECTS GALORE
Since 2001, the ULP government has completed
over 180 major physical projects and has over 50 on-going. Further, there have been over 100
non-physical capital projects covering human development, fiscal reform,
economic development, regional integration, and good governance projects. And
SVG has kept LIAT in the air!
The returning national may hear some griping
and propaganda from the Opposition. But
we say look with your eyes and se the truth!
June
25th 2010
EUSTACE’S
MOUNTAIN OF FOLLIES
SOMETHING WRONG WITH EUSTACE
Arnhim Eustace has been in
active politics for twelve years now, since 1998. That is more than enough time for the people
of St. Vincent and the Grenadines to make judgments about his suitability for
politics, his temperament and mindset, and his capacity or incapacity for
leadership. Any dispassionate analysis
must conclude that Eustace has been a profound disappoint in his role of
political person, his short-lived tenure as Minister of Finance and Prime
Minister, and as Leader of the Opposition.
Eustace just does not have what it takes. He knows this; so, too, does his party, the
NDP; and most importantly, the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines know
it. There is a lot wrong about Eustace. He would be a disaster for our country, if by
some miracle he should come to government again.
BRIEF REVIEW OF EUSTACE’S FOLLIES
Eustace displays a level of
ignorance of basic matters touching and concerning government which is simply
shocking. Moreover, his attitude to
people is plain wrong, impatient and pigheaded.
He has a closed mind and is not prepared to learn anything else or to
reflect on new ideas. He is stuck in a
stubborn, anachronistic time-warp of irrelevance to today’s challenges and
circumstances. Even when he is factually
wrong, he insists that he is right and proceeds to treat hard facts as though
they are disputative opinions. He has no subtlety of mind or grace. For all this, he is applauded, without any
logic or rationale, on the sidelines by hypocrites masquerading as informed
persons and nincompoops singing in advance for an elusive supper which is
unlikely to arrive. It’s sickening. People like James Mitchell, Jerry Scott,
Monty Roberts, Frank Da Silva, and even St. Clair Leacock have seen through
Eustace’s failings, lack of capacity, and persona unsuited for a caring
politics and a good-natured people called Vincentians. He has no love in his
heart for people.
SOME EXAMPLES OF EUSTACE’S FOLLIES
In his brief period of Minister
of Finance (2 ½ years), inclusive of a five-month stint as a lacklustre Prime
Minister, Eustace has given us examples galore to substantiate his bad attitude
and wrong conceptions. Let us list some
of them.
(1)
As Minister of Finance, he verbally abused public servants. He told them on TV “not one cent more for you
all”. He said it in a manner as though
he wanted to fight. Most unpleasant!
Further, he chastised the public servants as foolish in their request for
100-percent mortgages. His response was:
“You want me to bankrupt NCB.” He had
closed his mind to a sensible, workable proposal. That proposal has been
successfully implemented by the ULP government.
(2)
As Minister of Finance, he lambasted teachers in the House of
Assembly. He said that the government
was not getting results for its expenditure on education. For this he mainly blamed the teachers when
his government had no proper policy or implementation framework for education.
(3)
As Minister of Finance, he verbally abused the Catholic nuns and
others on national TV who were demanding that government pay all the teachers
in government-assisted church or private secondary schools. He called the nuns “a bunch of foreigners”
who have no idea of government finances.
The ULP government has been paying all the teachers for these schools
and there is no problem with it at all.
Again, Eustace failed to listen to any voice but his own.
(4)
As Minister of Finance, Eustace piloted “the Greedy Bill” to
increase gratuities and pensions for parliamentarians. He even wanted their wives to get
pensions. He would not listen. He was pig-headed. Then he came on radio to apologise when
people protested. His insincere apology
was rejected. He simply wanted to save
his butt politically.
(5)
As Minister of Finance/Prime Minister his role with Nano’s Banks is
yet to be explained fully or properly by him.
(6)
As Leader of the Opposition Eustace has given us some real howlers,
including:
(i)
He said that he did not know that poverty existed in SVG until he
did house-to-house campaign for the 1998 elections. Where was he living, cocooned on Mars? Where did he grow up, in the skies? Incidentally, by 1998 Kairi Consultants had
already reported that SVG has a general poverty level of 37.5 percent of the
population and an indigence level (“dirt poor” poverty) of 25.7 percent of the
population.
(ii)
He said he did not know that the former estate-workers at Orange
Hill, Wallilabou and Richmond, were due their severance pay. Was this man living in SVG? Was this man not the Fiscal Adviser or
Minister of Finance?
(iii)
He confessed that he did not realise that the Development
Corporation had passed all the bad debts onto the Development Bank which he
started in the year 2000 as Minister of Finance. Where was he looking? Up the wrong end of the barrel of a gun?
(iv) He
confessed, too, that he really messed up as Minister of Finance with the
Housing Project at Diamond and at Gibson Corner. Still, he tried to wriggle out. Mungalsingh tricked him at Diamond. At Gibson Corner he was missing in
action. Justice Monica Joseph criticised
him in her Report on these matters.
(v)
Eustace confessed that he lied to the people when he said in 2005,
on the eve of President Chen’s visit to SVG, that the NDP candlelight march was
against poverty. He said afterwards that
it was about trying to persuade the President not to give SVG any money for the
international airport. Unpatriotic!
(vi) Eustace
has taken anti-people and anti-national positions against SVG’s membership of
Petro-Caribe, ALBA and the Non-Aligned Movement. He supported Texaco in its conflict with the
government in 2005. He supported Allen
Stanford’s Caribbean Star against LIAT.
He supported the Greaves Family over the state-owned Input Warehouse
Company and the farmers on the matter of who should import sugar exclusively;
the sugar profits go to subsidise the farmers’ inputs. He is against SVG’s relations with Cuba,
Venezuela, and Libya. He asks: “What
would America say?” USA has said
nothing. Eustace’s slavish mind is
sickening.
(vii) Eustace
recently showed his ignorance by asserting as a fact the falsehood that mainland
China has a veto over a country’s membership of the United Nations’ Security
Council to which SVG was exploring a bid for a non-permanent seat. He said to avoid the veto, SVG was going to
break relations with Taiwan. Eustace
does not have it to be a leader anywhere.
(viii) Eustace
recently got all six facts wrong about the tug to be used at the Port. He was motivated by ignorance and malice
towards Ken Boyea. What a terrible man!
(ix) Eustace
recently attacked the children’s successes at the Common Entrance Exams by
saying that the Government was making the tests easier. Total rubbish!
(x)
Eustace got his law and facts wrong about the nature of a Coroner’s
Inquest regarding the enquiry into the death of three men in Vermont during
VincyPac. Eustace does not have what it
takes.
SUMMARY
Frank Da
Silva, a member of the NDP, has openly stated that not only is Eustace not up
for the job, he also has no heart. Da
Silva has stated on radio that Eustace has a bad-minded, unforgiving spirit. Da Silva stated that he would prefer to vote
for Ralph one thousand times before Eustace.
James Mitchell criticised Eustace heavily in his recent book and he is
all about town “dissing” Eustace as a Leader.
Even Jonathan Peters was on TV declaring that Eustace’s leadership is a
disaster and that he is no match for the Comrade. Eustace is NDP’s leader by default. He is a disaster!
June 17th 2010
EUSTACE
CLEAN-BOWLED ON TUG ISSUE
CLEAN-BOWLED
Arnhim Eustace, the leader of
the Opposition, NDP, was clean-bowled by a ball which he should have left
alone. Last week Monday (June 7th),
Eustace made a series of false allegations about a tug service which the SVG
Port Authority has put in place for vessels of a certain tonnage entering Port
Kingstown, Campden Park, and Greathead.
Within hours of Eustace’s false utterances, the Chairman of the Board of
the Port Authority, Edwin Snagg, had publicly rebutted him on every material
particular. Later in the very week,
Snagg and Ken Boyea, esteemed businessman and part-owner of the tug, demolished
Eustace completely on radio. Eustace has
been left licking his wounds and again demonstrating that the job of leadership
is way beyond him.
THE FALSEHOODS
The string of Eustace’s untruths
about the tug service includes:-
1.
That the Port Authority awarded the contract for the tug service to
Boyea’s company without a tendering process.
2.
That there was no public advertisement for any tendering process.
3.
That the company which was awarded the contract was registered only
six days before the law governing the rates for the tug services was passed.
4.
That there was no need for a tug service and towage charge.
5.
That the private tug is being moored at Ottley Hall Marina without
charge.
6.
That repairs are probably done to it at Ottley Hall free of charge
because Boyea is the Chairman of the state-owned Ottley Hall company.
The last two falsehoods were
raised as rhetorical queries by Eustace and no doubt amount to a defamation of
Boyea. Eustace really has it in for
Boyea. And this is not the first
time: A classic bull in a china shop!
THE TRUTH
The truthful position in
response to each of the Eustace falsehoods is as follows:-
1.
A tendering process was put in place to assess bids from private
persons or companies to provide the tug service for the Port Authority. The Tenders Committee was composed of Mark
Lulley (Chairman); Paul Kirby (Port Manager); R. Joseph (Chief Pilot – Port
Authority); D. Robin (Director of Maritime Administration); and B. Caine
(Commander of SVG Coast Guard).
2.
Notices of the tender were published in The News and Searchlight
newspapers in the period September 26, 2008 to October 10, 2008. Four bids resulted from these
advertisements. These bids came from:
(a) Somara SAS of Martinque (represented by local agents Corea’s); (b) K Group
Marine (represented by Kelly Glass); (c) W.J. Abbotts and Sons (represented by
Ken Boyea); and (d) Coloured Fin Limited of Trinidad.
The four
companies were also invited to appear before the Tenders’ Committee to make
their presentations. All of them, except
the Trinidad firm, appeared.
3.
An old company in SVG, WJ Abbotts and Sons was awarded the Tender
as a consequence of the tendering process.
The Port Authority acted on the recommendation of the Tenders’
Committee.
4.
The need for a tug service is based on the following:-
(i)
In any port a tug service is a plus. The berthing and unberthing of vessels is
much faster when the procedures are performed with the aid of a tug and not the
vessels’ power. This leads to a faster
turn around time and greater efficiency.
(ii)
Vessels have been getting bigger and bigger. The main shipping line, Tropical, now has
vessels over 10,551 Gross Registered Tonnes (GRT); the previous vessel was
4,654 GRT. Crowley vessels have moved
from 9,000 GRT to 12,000 GRT.
(iii)
At the Campden Park Container Port (CPCP), the vessels now have to
berth starboard side to facilitate the Mobile Harbour Crane. All the physical and engineering
circumstances demand a tug service. For
example, the wind and current at CPCP take the vessels away from the pier while
berthing without a tug.
(iv) Recent
experiences showed the need for a tug:
In 2000, the MV Clara Marine was about to run aground off the bus
terminal; the Port had to use the Pilot Launch which is not fit for the
purpose; the Pilot Launch suffered major damage. In 2009, during the hurricane season, there
were two vessels without power but the Port was unable to move them. One of them, the Caribbean Rose, was anchored
in the Port Harbour and had stated to list; it was a hazard to the Port and
there was no tug to remove it.
(v)
A tug service assists in providing fire fighting services from the
sea; insurance risks are reduced; it supports vessels without bow thrusters.
The new
regulators exempt the banana boats and the cruiseships from mandatory tug
service; it is optional for them.
5.
W.J. Abbott and Sons pay for its use of the Ottley Hall
Marina. Anyone can ask Paul Cyrus,
Ottley Hall’s Manager, about this.
6.
Repairs are paid for on the tug done at Ottley Hall.
PRIVATE SECTOR ISSUE
Eustace is a wholly inconsistent
man on the issue of the role of the state and the private sector. He suggests that if a Tug Service was
required, the State should have done it.
We beg to differ. This is an
activity well-suited for the private sector.
Indeed, if the private tug service breaks down, the private sector
company which is contracted must provide alternative tug services at its own
cost. Under the contractual arrangements
with W.J. Abbott, the Port Authority receives 10 percent of the changes. Before when Corea’s brought in the tug
service, especially for the “car boats”, the Port Authority got not one cent of
the tug charges. The tug service for
each of those car boats was US $8,000; the new tug service costs US
$6,500. The Corea’s tug boats were
brought in from Martinique and St. Lucia.
So, the money went out; now, it stays in SVG.
It should be pointed out that,
generally-speaking, freight rates for vessels coming to the Caribbean are
normally calculated on the assumption that all vessels will be utilising a tug
service since all other Caribbean ports have a mandatory requirement for tug services
for vessels above a certain GRT.
EUSTACE’S LETTER TO PM
After Edwin Snagg took Eustace
apart on Tuesday on radio, and the Prime Minister made it plain on his Tuesday
night radio programme that he would deal with Eustace on this matter after Snagg
and Boyea had done with him, Eustace lamely wrote a letter on the subject to
the PM on Wednesday June 9th.
The letter was now lamely posing questions. He was climbing down from his high accusatory
horse when he was egged on by his real leader, Elwardo Lynch. Eustace panicked and rushed the letters in on
Wednesday afternoon, more than 24 hours before he delivered the letter to the
PM’s Office. The PM saw through
Eustace’s nonsense. This article surely
is more than a full reply to dotish, irresponsible, reckless Arnhim! He has been bowled by a ball which he should
have left alone.
June 11th 2010
HEROISM AND SOME BIG
ISSUES
HEROISM AT SEA
Last Friday (June 4th), a prayerful and happy nation received the good news that the three fishermen (Mark Dennie, Walter Lynch and Amron Thomas) who were adrift at sea some eleven days before were found alive and well in Puerto Rican waters by that territory’s Coast Guard. Their survival, in a small fishing boat, represents a heroic triumph of the human spirit over adversity. They did not succumb to doubt and negativism; they confronted their challenges